Satoreotide
JR11, DOTA-JR11 (OPS201, IPN01072; Lu-177 satoreotide tetraxetan), NODAGA-JR11 (OPS202, IPN01070; Ga-68 satoreotide trizoxetan); also LM3 and other "SSTR antagonist" radioligands as a class
1What it is
Satoreotide is a somatostatin analogue designed to do the opposite of octreotide (#124) at the receptor: it binds SSTR2 but does not switch it on. For a long time nuclear-medicine researchers assumed an was needed, because agonists trigger internalisation that traps the radioactive metal inside the cell. Work in Basel and Boston in the mid-2000s showed that antagonists, despite not internalising, bound to several times more receptor sites and stayed on the tumour longer, giving higher tumour doses in animal and then human studies. JR11 emerged as the lead antagonist and was renamed satoreotide when it entered formal development. The Ga-68 imaging version (OPS202) and the Lu-177 therapy version (OPS201) were taken through Phase I/II by a pharmaceutical sponsor; the project's current status after that programme is unclear †.
2How it's thought to work
3What the research shows
Lu-177 satoreotide tetraxetan in progressive NETs
Earlier Phase 1 with unexpected haematotoxicity
Ga-68 satoreotide trizoxetan PET vs Ga-68 DOTATOC
Pilot comparison with Lu-177 DOTATATE
Human data in other SSTR-positive cancers
4Reported side effects and interactions
Literature-reported
haematological toxicity is the defining issue — lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia at grade 3–4 rates well above those seen with Lu-177 DOTATATE at comparable activity; two therapy-related myeloid neoplasms in 40 patients. No grade 3–4 kidney toxicity reported at 4.5 GBq with amino-acid protection. Nausea and fatigue as for other PRRT. One death after a dose-limiting toxicity in a patient with prior chemotherapy was judged unlikely to be related.Community-reported
Community use. essentially none documented.
Theoretical. antagonists lack octreotide's hormone-suppressing effect, so hormonal flare in functional tumours could in principle differ from PRRT; not characterised.
Interactions. somatostatin analogue is still used before imaging, though antagonists may be less affected by receptor occupancy than agonists (small study evidence).
Markers researchers commonly monitor
Taken from the trial protocols; relevant only to patients in studies:
| Marker | Why it's watched |
|---|---|
| CBC with differential, repeated frequently after each cycle | haematological toxicity was dose-limiting, and lymphocyte and platelet nadirs drove dose modification. |
| Bone-marrow dosimetry (blood-based and imaging-based) | a 1.5 Gy marrow limit was built into the protocol. |
| Kidney dosimetry, creatinine/eGFR | 23 Gy kidney limit; amino-acid co-infusion used. |
| Chromogranin A and relevant hormones | biochemical response. |
| Ga-68 antagonist PET | for selection and response. |
Free for everyone. Safety information is never behind a paywall.
5Reconstitution and handling
Not applicable to individuals. Prepared only in trial-site radiopharmacies under investigational protocols. No calculator link is provided for this compound.
6Commonly studied alongside
DOTATATE (#201) and DOTATOC (#202) as the agonist comparators; octreotide (#124); other antagonist ligands (LM3, Cu-64/Ga-68 NODAGA-LM3) that have continued in academic studies after the sponsored satoreotide programme.
Informational cross-links. Not stack recommendations.
7Regulatory status by region
| Region | Status (checked —) |
|---|---|
| United States | Not FDA-approved; investigational (orphan designation held †) |
| European Union | Not authorised; investigational |
| United Kingdom | Not licensed |
| Australia | Not approved; Australian centres participated in the Phase I/II |
| South Africa | Not registered |
| Sport (WADA) | Not listed |
8Open questions
- Can activity, peptide mass or cycle scheduling be tuned so that the higher tumour dose is kept while marrow toxicity falls to agonist-like levels?
- Does the antagonist approach translate into better PFS or survival than Lu-177 DOTATATE in a randomised trial? None exists.
- Whether antagonist PET (satoreotide or LM3) will be developed to registration as an imaging agent.
- Future of the programme after the sponsored Phase I/II †.
9References
- 1Ginj M et al. (2006). Radiolabeled somatostatin receptor antagonists are preferable to agonists for in vivo peptide receptor targeting of tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. PubMed · DOI
- 2Wild D et al. (2014). Comparison of somatostatin receptor agonist and antagonist for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: a pilot study. J Nucl Med. PubMed · DOI
- 3Nicolas GP et al. (2018). Sensitivity comparison of 68Ga-OPS202 and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective phase II imaging study. J Nucl Med. PubMed · DOI
- 4Reidy-Lagunes D et al. (2019). Phase I trial of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with radiolabeled somatostatin antagonist 177Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan. Clin Cancer Res. PubMed · DOI
- 5Wild D et al. (2024). A phase I/II study of the safety and efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-satoreotide tetraxetan in advanced somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. PubMed · DOI
- 6Fani M, Nicolas GP, Wild D (2017). Somatostatin receptor antagonists for imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med. PubMed · DOI
† Being confirmed by our reviewers against current sources.
10Community
Threads and protocols are visible to members. Joining is free.
Self-reported side effects Phase 2
11Page history
Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Found an error? Report it · Editorial standards — corrections are logged here.