Angiotensin-(1-7)
Ang-(1-7), A(1-7); TXA127 (a pharmaceutical formulation); NorLeu³-A(1-7) / DSC127 is a modified analogue
1What it is
Most people know the renin–angiotensin system through its pressure-raising arm: renin makes angiotensin I, ACE converts it to angiotensin II, and angiotensin II constricts vessels, retains salt and drives fibrosis. That is the arm blocked by ACE inhibitors and ARBs.
Angiotensin-(1-7) belongs to the other arm. The enzyme ACE2 converts angiotensin II into this shorter peptide, which acts on a different receptor (Mas) and does roughly the opposite: vessels relax, fibrosis slows, inflammation falls. Part of the benefit of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is thought to come from shifting the system toward this branch. ACE2's second claim to fame — as the entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 — is why this peptide received a burst of attention after 2020.
It is a research compound and a hospital-trial compound, not a self-administered one. Community use: essentially none documented, and the seconds-long makes informal use pointless.
2How it's thought to work
3What the research shows
Haematopoietic recovery after chemotherapy
COVID-19 and ARDS
Diabetic foot ulcers (topical analogue)
Human cardiovascular and renal physiology
Cardiac, renal and pulmonary protection
Cancer
4Reported side effects and interactions
Literature-reported
Generally well tolerated in short human studies. Reported effects include mild hypotension, flushing and injection-site reactions. No long-term human safety data.Community-reported
None. Not in self-directed use.Theoretical. Hypotension when stacked on RAS-blocking medication; effects on haematopoiesis mean the consequences of chronic exposure on blood cell lines are unstudied; the proliferative effect on progenitor cells cuts both ways in anyone with a haematological malignancy.
Interactions. ACE inhibitors raise endogenous Ang-(1-7) levels by blocking its degradation, so combining them is pharmacologically additive. Additive blood-pressure lowering with any antihypertensive. No formal interaction studies.
Markers researchers commonly monitor
Study-protocol measures; there is no home-monitoring use case.
| Marker | Why it's watched |
|---|---|
| Blood pressure | the expected pharmacological effect and the dose-limiting one. |
| Full blood count with differential and platelets | the haematopoietic effect is both the therapeutic hypothesis and the thing to watch. |
| Creatinine, eGFR, electrolytes | the kidney is a principal target organ of the RAS. |
| Plasma renin activity, angiotensin II and Ang-(1-7) levels | pathway engagement, in research settings with access to these assays. |
| hs-CRP or other inflammatory markers | the anti-inflammatory hypothesis. |
| Echocardiographic measures of remodelling | in cardiac studies, over months rather than days. |
Free for everyone. Safety information is never behind a paywall.
5Reconstitution and handling
Not applicable as a consumer practice. Research and trial material is handled as a sterile preparation for infusion or administration in a clinical setting, and the extremely short plasma means that bolus self-administration would have no sustained pharmacological meaning. No calculator preset applies.
6Commonly studied alongside
Apelin (#152 — the other ACE2-linked counter-regulatory peptide), adrenomedullin (#151), natriuretic peptides. In the laboratory it is studied together with ACE2 activators and with AT2-receptor agonists as parts of the same protective axis.
Informational cross-links. Not stack recommendations.
7Regulatory status by region
| Region | Status (checked —) |
|---|---|
| United States | Not FDA-approved. Investigational; orphan designations have been granted for TXA127 in certain indications † |
| European Union | Not authorised |
| United Kingdom | Not licensed |
| Australia | Not approved |
| South Africa | Not registered |
| Sport | Not specifically listed by WADA; as an unapproved peptide it would fall under S0 if used. Check the current list |
8Open questions
- Can the peptide be stabilised or delivered well enough to matter clinically, or is the Mas receptor better addressed with a small molecule?
- Did the COVID-19 trials fail on biology or on design and timing?
- Does chronic Mas-receptor activation produce the anti-fibrotic benefit seen in rodents in humans?
- What is the real contribution of this arm to the benefit of ACE inhibitors and ARBs?
9References
- 1Santos RAS et al. (2003). Angiotensin-(1-7) is an endogenous ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor Mas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. PubMed · DOI
- 2Santos RAS et al. (2018). The renin–angiotensin system: going beyond the classical paradigms. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. PubMed · DOI
- 3Rodgers KE et al. (2006). Development of angiotensin (1-7) as an agent to accelerate dermal repair. Wound Repair Regen [verify]. PubMed
- 4Petty WJ et al. (2009). Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of angiotensin-(1-7), an endogenous antiangiogenic hormone. Clin Cancer Res. PubMed · DOI
- 5Ferrario CM, Chappell MC (2004). Novel angiotensin peptides. Cell Mol Life Sci. PubMed · DOI
- 6Wagener G et al. (2022). Angiotensin-(1-7) in severe COVID-19 — randomized trial report. Crit Care / Chest [verify journal and outcome]. PubMed
References are being resolved to PubMed/DOI identifiers; links search PubMed for the citation until then.
† Being confirmed by our reviewers against current sources.
10Community
Threads and protocols are visible to members. Joining is free.
Self-reported side effects Phase 2
11Page history
Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Found an error? Report it · Editorial standards — corrections are logged here.